scalarp and nonscalarp



On 5/2/10, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:

> I think we have two different points:
>
> 1. Get a consistent "wrong" implementation to close the bug reports.
> 2. Open a feature request for a new implementation of scalarp and
>    nonscalarp, which does not use assumptions on functions and symbols,
>    but uses only known facts.

Yes, you're right about that. Please proceed with item (1).

best

Robert Dodier