Le 29 juin 2012 ? 19:50, Stavros Macrakis a ?crit :
> Not sure I understand why you need multiple context names for this. Can't you use the same context name if you kill it when you're done?
When the contexts can't be shared, we must be sure that there are no name conflicts.
For example, if functionA calls functionB, and they share the same context,
then functionB cannot kill the context when called from functionA,
but can kill it when called from the main program flow.
To simplify the code, each function has its own context and kill it when done.
When functionA calls itself, we see that the context name must differ at each call.
J?r?me