path



>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> writes:

    Robert> On 2012-10-29, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
    Adam> You are right.
    Adam> What is the reason for this behaviour ?
    >> 
    >> You mean for load_pathname?  I don't know.  I was merely reporting
    >> what the documentation stated.  It does seem useful for batch to also
    >> set load_pathname appropriately.  Perhaps there's some reason this is
    >> not done, but I don't know what it is.

    Robert> I don't think there's any rationale for the current behavior. I agree
    Robert> that binding load_pathname within batch is just as useful as for load,
    Robert> so if someone wants to post a patch, I'd be happy to apply it.

    Robert> I'm pretty sure I wrote the existing documentation for load_pathname by
    Robert> grepping the code and then writing down the functions which modify it.
    Robert> Same goes for a lot of stuff -- the documentation is descriptive, not
    Robert> prescriptive.

At least it's documented!

I'll modify batch to bind load_pathname soon, with updated
documentation.

Ray