Errors in test suite



On 02/25/2013 12:07 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 2013-02-25, Paul Bowyer <pbowyer at olynet.com> wrote:
>
>> I just did "git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/maxima/code master"
>>
>> then I built it, installed it, and ran the test suite.
>>
>> Error summary:
>> Errors found in
>> /home/pfb/maxima-test/share/maxima/5.28.0_314_g34d3945/tests/rtest1.mac,
>> problems:
>> (109 111 113 115 117)
>> Error found in rtest_laplace, problem:
>> (error break)
> I've pushed tags for 5.29. To be honest, I don't think that will change
> the code you have checked out, but who knows. At least build_info should
> report the correct version (namely branch_5_29_base_<something>). Can
> you please try it again.
>
> best
>
> Robert Dodier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>
Hi Robert:

I tried again with the following:

git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/maxima/code master
cd master
git describe gives      branch-5_29-base-145-g6a57b96
git branch gives        master

./bootstrap
./configure --prefix=$HOME/maxima-test --enable-sbcl 
--with-sbcl=/usr/local/bin/sbcl
make
make install

ran xmaxima using a bash file containing:
#! /bin/bash
# script name: runmaxima
export 
PATH="~/maxima-test/bin:~/maxima-test/lib:~/maxima-test/libexec:"$PATH
xmaxima -l sbcl

ran build_info and the testsuite:

(%i1) build_info ();
(%o1)
Maxima version: "branch_5_29_base_145_g6a57b96"
Maxima build date: "2013-02-25 14:19:26"
Host type: "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
Lisp implementation type: "SBCL"
Lisp implementation version: "1.1.4"
(%i2) run_testsuite();
Running tests in rtestnset: 553/553 tests passed
Running tests in rtest1:
********************** Problem 109 ***************
Input:
(load(file_search(test_readbase_lisp, file_search_tests)),
test_readbase_lisp())


Result:
file_search1: false not found in file_search_maxima,file_search_lisp.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 20, 30, 40]

********************** Problem 111 ***************
Input:
(autof(test_readbase_lisp_autoload, 
file_search(test_readbase_lisp_autoload,
                             file_search_tests)), 
test_readbase_lisp_autoload())


Result:
file_search1: false not found in file_search_lisp,system.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19]

********************** Problem 113 ***************
Input:
(load(file_search(test_readbase_maxima, file_search_tests)),
test_readbase_maxima())


Result:
file_search1: false not found in file_search_maxima,file_search_lisp.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[4, 3, 2, 1, 40, 30, 20, 10]

********************** Problem 115 ***************
Input:
(batch(file_search(test_readbase_maxima, file_search_tests)),
test_readbase_maxima())


Result:
file_search1: false not found in file_search_maxima.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[4, 3, 2, 1, 40, 30, 20, 10]

********************** Problem 117 ***************
Input:
(auto_mexpr(test_readbase_maxima_autoload,
file_search(test_readbase_maxima_autoload, file_search_tests)),
test_readbase_maxima_autoload())


Result:
file_search1: false not found in file_search_maxima,system.
error-catch

This differed from the expected result:
[19, 17, 13, 11, 7, 5, 3, 2]

119/124 tests passed

The following 5 problems failed: (109 111 113 115 117)
.
.
.
Error summary:
Errors found in 
/home/pfb/maxima-test/share/maxima/branch_5_29_base_145_g6a57b96/tests/rtest1.mac, 
problems:
(109 111 113 115 117)
Error found in rtest_laplace, problem:
(error break)
5 tests failed out of 9,500 total tests.
Evaluation took:
   219.512 seconds of real time
   219.377711 seconds of total run time (218.209638 user, 1.168073 system)
   [ Run times consist of 6.776 seconds GC time, and 212.602 seconds 
non-GC time. ]
   99.94% CPU
   14,482 forms interpreted
   8,129 lambdas converted
   694,423,998,006 processor cycles
   27,979,476,480 bytes consed

(%o0)                                done

These are the same failures I originally reported, but this time I 
copied the error results. So, I guess I had the correct source initially 
and didn't know it.

Respectfully,

Paul Bowyer