On Tue, March 19, 2013 at 12:22PM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
>As such, I *think* that the only way to ensure that the right stuff is
>built every time on GCL, when .lisp files can change "randomly" is to
>build everything twice. Yuck.
>
>Since I'm guessing that no-one's keen on that solution, I'm going to
>carry on advocating building sys-proclaim.lisp just once in each tree!
>:-)
I'd rather have everything compile twice than have occasional bad
builds. But my first choice would be to dump sys-proclaim.lisp.
Dan