How to avoid ^- in maxima output? (Leo Butler) [Martin Kraska]
Subject: How to avoid ^- in maxima output? (Leo Butler) [Martin Kraska]
From: Martin Kraska
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:45:17 +0100
Leo, thanks for the agreement. Yes, it is sensible to include the code
changes. For the future, I guess, just adding rules to sm_rules in our
session init would be sufficient, wouldn't it? Then we do not need to bother
with updates.
The only direct change was made to the match pattern in order to resolve
different interpretation of a^b^c in Maxima and SMath:
matchdeclare([sm_x],true,sm_y,lambda([e],if is(numberp(e) and e<0 and e#-1)
or is(not(atom(e)) and (op(e)="-" or op(e)="^")) then true else false));
Thanks again for your help.
Martin
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Leo Butler [mailto:l_butler at users.sourceforge.net]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 1. November 2013 15:21
> An: Martin Kraska
> Cc: l_butler at users.sourceforge.net; maxima at math.utexas.edu; graubman at fh-
> brandenburg.de
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Maxima] How to avoid ^- in maxima output? (Leo
> Butler) [Martin Kraska]
>
> >
> > From: Martin Kraska <kraska at fh-brandenburg.de>
> > CC: <maxima at math.utexas.edu>, <graubman at fh-brandenburg.de>
> > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:45:20 +0100
> >
> > Leo,
> >
> > we think, that we can ask the user to install the latest maxima
> > release, because this might be a plausible request for them. Insofar
> > your proposal sounds reasonable
> >
> > We perhaps won't ask the users to mess around in the maxima
installation.
> In our understanding that would mean sacrificing user's convenience for
the
> sake of our convenience. We also do not think that it is a good idea that
we
> mess around in the maxima repository, things might go wrong there.
> >
> > Thus we ask you to include the code in the next maxima release and
accept
> a temporary perhaps non-GPL compliant state until the next windows release
of
> maxima is available.
> >
> > Martin.
>
>
> Martin, Ok.
>
> You mentioned that you had patched the code to handle other anomalies.
> Would you like me to include that?
>
> Leo