cabs vs abs (bug?)



I fixed abs by recompiling with a recent cvs tree, thanks. It didn't work in 
my experience back before I used cvs, but back then, I assumed it was normal. 
It is no big deal since cabs always worked.

This is definitively not a (current) bug.

Thanks!

> Daniel Lemire writes:
>  > > I don't know what you are doing, but in Schelter's xmaxima,
>  > > this definition  f(x):=abs(x+1);
>  > > f(1);
>  > > works correctly.
>  > >
>  > > I see no reason to use cabs instead of abs.
>  > > Are you translating/ compiling this function somehow?
>  > > What are on lines c1-c4 ?
>  > > RJF
>  >
>  > That's strange because abs never worked for me. Never. Even back before
>  > I compiled my own version from CVS. According to "describe", there is no
>  > such thing as "abs".
>
> GCL (GNU Common Lisp)  Version(2.3.8) Wed Mar 28 10:47:31 EST 2001
> Licensed under GNU Library General Public License
> Contains Enhancements by W. Schelter
> Maxima 5.5 Wed Mar 28 09:31:56 EST 2001 (with enhancements by W. Schelter).
> Licensed under the GNU Public License (see file COPYING)
>
> (C8) f(x):=abs(x+1);
>
> (D8)                          f(x) := ABS(x + 1)
> (C9) f(1);
>
> (D9)                                   2
> (C10) f(-5);
>
> (D10)                                  4
>
> Osman