Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 3/22/08, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good point. I'll ask the author about it. But mere aggregation doesn't
>> imply inclusion under the terms of the GPL. Perhaps another directory
>> of contributions (free or not) would be acceptable, assuming the share
>> and contrib directories are actually GPL code. Or maybe you don't want
>> to consider this at all, which is ok with me too.
So even just adding a directory and a file saying the stuff is not GPL
is too much work? Fair enough.
>
> There is some stuff in Maxima which is not GPL. There is some LGPL
> stuff, and some public domain stuff, and maybe some other stuff.
> But to the best of my knowledge there is nothing for which the license
> terms prohibit use which is allowed by the GPL. The noncommercial
> use clause of the DONLP license is just such a prohibition.
Yes, the noncommercial clause is a problem for DONLP2 and maxima.
Ray