On 5/10/10 12:19 PM, Barton Willis wrote:
> The orthopoly code supports two-dimensional output for the orthogonal
> polynomials. I think this is more trouble than it is
> worth--two-dimensional output it makes it hard to copy and paste,
The same can be said for sum, integrate, x^2, or 355/133. :-)
>
> I'm inclined to eliminate the support for two-dimensional output
> for the orthogonal polynomials. I could copy all the output code to an
> optional file, but due to my lazy nature, I'd prefer to eliminate
> two-dimensional output. We'll still have tex output (actually improved
> tex output for new version of orthopoly). Comments?
I actually rather like the 2-D display because it roughly matches what
math books show. Especially for things like assoc_legendre_p(n,m,x). I
can never remember which parameter n and m are, but the 2D display makes
it clear to me.
But I won't oppose removing the 2D display.
Ray