Subject: ./configure options and speed of execution.
From: Rupert Swarbrick
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:18:17 +0100
Dmitry Shkirmanov <piminusmeson at bk.ru> writes:
> Hello, list. By accident i found that maxima built from source with
> default ./configure options works very slow in comparison with maxima
> built with this(default archlinux configure options):
>
> | ./configure--prefix=/usr--mandir=/usr/share/man--infodir=/usr/share/info \
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib--enable-sbcl--with-default-lisp=sbcl
> |
>
> For example, maxima built with default configure options needs about
> 20 seconds to run attached maple_V_N_test.wxm program. Maxima built
> with default archlinux options takes about 3 seconds to run this
> program.(Maple, needs 0.89 seconds to run this program(of course,
> program must be accordingly changed) )
Can you tell us what the configure script chooses for its options when
you go for the defaults? For example, which lisp implementation is it
using? If you could attach your config.log, we might be able to work out
what's going on more easily.
Rupert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20120613/d2184334/attachment.pgp>;