Subject: ./configure options and speed of execution.
From: Dmitry Shkirmanov
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:56:05 +0400
>
> Can you tell us what the configure script chooses for its options when
> you go for the defaults? For example, which lisp implementation is it
> using? If you could attach your config.log, we might be able to work out
>
I attached both config.log files. One for default configure options,
second for configure with
./configure--prefix=/usr--mandir=/usr/share/man--infodir=/usr/share/info \
--libexecdir=/usr/lib--enable-sbcl--with-default-lisp=sbcl
> Dmitry Shkirmanov<piminusmeson at bk.ru> writes:
>
>> Hello, list. By accident i found that maxima built from source with
>> default ./configure options works very slow in comparison with maxima
>> built with this(default archlinux configure options):
>>
>> | ./configure--prefix=/usr--mandir=/usr/share/man--infodir=/usr/share/info \
>> --libexecdir=/usr/lib--enable-sbcl--with-default-lisp=sbcl
>> |
>>
>> For example, maxima built with default configure options needs about
>> 20 seconds to run attached maple_V_N_test.wxm program. Maxima built
>> with default archlinux options takes about 3 seconds to run this
>> program.(Maple, needs 0.89 seconds to run this program(of course,
>> program must be accordingly changed) )
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: config.log
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20120613/704dddff/attachment-0002.ksh>;
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: config.log
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20120613/704dddff/attachment-0003.ksh>;