Maxima version number, was: numerical methods gone missing?



On 6/10/06, James Supancic <arrummzen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, ok. So its a simple case of us using the wrong version
> of the documentation (or wrong version of the program).
> I wouldn't have thought that a two number difference in the
> third element of the version number would have mattered.

Yes, the Maxima numbering system is misleading, isn't it.

It turns out 5.9.3 is substantially different from 5.9.1.
If you're not already using 5.9.3, I recommend it pretty strongly.

We should probably make a bigger change in the version
number in the next release ...

By the way, thanks a lot for helping out on IRC.
You are brave & kind.

Robert Dodier